Pages

Showing posts with label Freedom. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Freedom. Show all posts

Sunday, September 27, 2015

Donie's Ireland daily news BLOG

Tánaiste Joan Burton says planning process is to blame for delay in social housing

   

The Tánaiste Joan Burton says the process of building new social housing is taking longer than she would like.

Last year the Government announced that almost €4bn would be invested in the construction of 35,000 social housing units.
There are 130,000 households currently on local authority lists waiting for a home.
It comes as homeless charities call for immediate action to alleviate the housing crisis, as a homeless man was found dead in a lane on Dublin city centre yesterday morning.
The Minister for Social Protection said the planning application process is slowing down construction of much needed houses.
Ms Burton said: “It’s a lot slower, to be honest, to get off the ground than most of us would like.
“If we could also look at a suggestion by Father Peter McVerry that we may need to speed up the planning process, because we have sites available in Dublin for housing, but the planning process can be very slow, followed by the tender process
“So it can take a long time to actually get houses up on sites.”

Pope Francis in the USA offers a broad vision of Religious Freedom

         

Standing near Independence Hall, where America’s founding documents were signed, Pope Francis on Saturday called religious freedom a “fundamental right” and laid out a broad and tolerant vision of what it should be, but also warned about its perversion “as a pretext for hatred and brutality.”

On the final leg of his first trip to the United States, Francis arrived in Philadelphia and went straight to the city’s Roman Catholic basilica, exhorting ordinary Catholics to bolster their role in sustaining the church. After a Mass before 2,400 people and a long midday rest, he traveled to Independence Mall and broadened his canvas: addressing the place of faith in a nation.
Religious freedom means the right to worship God, “as our consciences dictate,” Francis said. And, he went on, the principle goes beyond temples and the private sphere: Religion also serves society, especially as a bulwark “in the face of every claim to absolute power.”
Francis emerged from Independence Hall to the strains of Aaron Copland’s “Fanfare for the Common Man.” He stood at the lectern used by Abraham Lincoln to deliver the Gettysburg Address, and in his own address, Francis extolled the principles of the country’s founding fathers embodied by the Declaration of Independence signed in the building behind him.
The brief speech was an elaboration on comments from his very first remarks on American soil, when on arrival Wednesday he told President Obama, that religious liberty “remains one of America’s most precious possessions,” and should be vigilantly protected.
But while some conservatives in politics and the church had expected his comments to bolster their opposition to the Obama administration’s health care mandate for contraception and other such issues on religious grounds, Francis did not press the issue on Saturday.
His comments seemed tilted toward creating an idea of religious liberty with broad applications — freedom to worship, but also to play a role in caring for others. Religious traditions, he said, “call to conversion, reconciliation, concern for the future of society, self-sacrifice in the service of the common good and compassion for those in need.” He continued, “At the heart of their spiritual mission is the proclamation of the truth and dignity of the human person and human rights.”
Francis listed the ways the exercise of religion suffered and how it could be twisted, without any specific references, such as to cruel interpretations of Islam by the Islamic State in Iraq and by the Taliban in Afghanistan or, in a completely different category, defiance in this country on religious grounds of same-sex marriage rulings.

Pope Calls to Embrace the Laity and Women

At the Cathedral Basilica of SS. Peter and Paul in Philadelphia, Pope Francis offered solutions for the problems facing the church in a rapidly changing society.
“In a world where various forms of modern tyranny seek to suppress religious freedom, or try to reduce it to a subculture without right to a voice in the public square, or to use religion as a pretext for hatred and brutality,” Francis said, “it is imperative that the followers of the various religions join their voices in calling for peace, tolerance and respect for the dignity and rights of others.”The audience on Independence Mall were mainly Latinos and other immigrants. And at one point, after giving a note of appreciation to the Quakersand their “ideal of a community united by brotherly love,” Francis departed from his prepared speech and delivered an impromptu lecture on globalization.
Growing more animated, he said it is a force for good if it works toward equalizing, uniting and bringing respect to people. But if globalization “tries to make everybody even, as if it was a sphere, that globalization destroys the richness and specificity of each person and each people.”Then, the Argentine pope, the first from Latin America, greeted the Hispanic people in the audience with affection. He noted the human cost of immigration and said, “Do not be discouraged by whatever challenges and hardships you face.”
In a country where speaking languages other than English can be controversial, he called on them to “never be ashamed of your traditions.”
His call for the United States to embrace immigrants has been a running theme; here, he gave them a direct morale boost.
Pope Francis arrived in Philadelphia on Saturday.CreditGabriella Demczuk for
Francis so far has had stops in Washington and New York, which included addresses to Congress and the United Nations, intimate moments with schoolchildren in Harlem and families of victims of the Sept. 11 attacks at ground zero and large public encounters in touchstone locales like Central Park, Fifth Avenue and Madison Square Garden.
He is ending his first trip to the United States with a weekend in Philadelphia, where huge crowds — the kind where he becomes a dot on the altar before a sea of humanity — are expected, first at a concert-celebration Saturday night on Benjamin Franklin Parkway and then a Mass on Sunday.
In the morning, speaking at a Mass at the Cathedral Basilica of SS. Peter and Paul, he cited Pope Leo XIII’s words to the Philadelphia-born Katharine Drexel — later recognized as a saint — during an 1887 audience: “What about you? What are you going to do?”
Francis said the question should be addressed today to young people and by implication to women, noting it was important that Leo asked the question of a laywoman. “We know that the future of the church calls, for a much more active engagement on the part of the laity,” he said.
The issue has particular relevance in a country where one-fifth of parishes have no priest in residence and parishioners are often called on to take up the burden, and where the proportion of people who identify as Catholics has declined to a fifth from about a quarter over the last 20 years.
Though he encouraged help from people in the pews, he gently warned that there were limits. “This does not mean relinquishing the spiritual authority with which we have been entrusted,” he said. “Rather, it means discerning and employing wisely the manifold gifts which the Spirit pours out upon the church.”
One of Francis’ biggest applause lines during his homily at St. Patrick’s Cathedral in New York on Friday came when he expressed his love and appreciation for nuns. He added to the thought on Saturday, remarking on the “immense contribution which women, lay and religious, have made and continue to make to the life of our communities.”
Francis spoke to bishops, priests and nuns from Pennsylvania at the cathedral, the 151-year-old seat of the Philadelphia Archdiocese, where he arrived by motorcade after flying in from New York. Archbishop Charles J. Chaput gave a formal welcome with a jocular line: “This is a city that would change its name to Francisville today,” he said.
Inside, worshipers included Dr. Tony Coletta, the chief executive of a health care company, who called the pope’s visit “a lifetime opportunity both for the city of Philadelphia and for us.”
“It’s as close to God as we will ever get on the earth,” Dr. Coletta said in the marble-clad nave shortly before the Mass started.
Francis timed his trip to Philadelphia to coincide with the World Meeting of Families, a Vatican-sponsored jamboree that occurs every three years. It was founded in 1994 by Pope John Paul II and takes place every three years. This is the first time it has been held in the United States, and organizers said some 18,000 people attended the week’s events.
Within a week of his return to Rome, the bishops of the church will convene a major meeting, or synod, on the family at the Vatican, and Francis asked his clergy to pray for the deliberations. A major tension lies in how to balance tradition and doctrine with calls for a wider role for women in the church and flexibility on issues such as communion and other sacraments for divorced and remarried Catholics.
Philadelphia has been preparing for Francis for months. Law enforcement agencies set up 19 checkpoints to create a secure zone around the Benjamin Franklin Parkway and seven more at Independence Mall, near the Delaware River.
Still, many residents in this city of 1.6 million showed the same forbearance that New Yorkers displayed during the pope’s time there from Wednesday to Friday.
“We need this,” said Irene Perry, 59 and a Catholic, who was sitting Friday on her stoop watching people pass through security near the parkway. “We need help. We have homeless, and people without jobs, and I think it’s a beautiful thing that  Pope Francis  is coming, and he’s going to bless all of us. We need peace in the world.”

27 year old dying mother says ‘I will miss my children growing up because of sunbeds’

    

Louise Cook, 27, has been told she has just weeks to live after she was diagnosed with terminal skin cancer.

A mum with terminal cancer has given a heartbreaking warning about using sunbeds.
Aged 27, Louise Cook has been told she has just weeks to live.
It means she will not see her three children, Summer, six, Mason, four, and Chloe, one, grow up.
In an interview with The Sun, Louise said: ‘I thought having a tan would help my self-esteem after a break- up.
‘Because of that I will not be here to watch my beautiful kids grow up. I didn’t really believe sunbeds could be so dangerous because they were so easily accessible.
‘I fear other young men and women will make the same mistake as me and put their image before their health.
‘If you want a tan, get a spray one. Children shouldn’t lose their mummies because of sunbeds.’
In early 2013, she discovered a mole on her back, but she was unaware it was a sign of skin cancer.
Louise was pregnant with Chloe when she was told it was a cancerous melanoma.
A GoFundMe appeal has been launched to help Louise’s children.

Breast cancer relapse is due to different genetic profiles

   

A new study, which will be presented at the European Cancer Congress (ECC) 2015, suggests that the cases of breast cancer that recur are linked to a different genetic profile and these drivers can be targetable with drugs.

Not all breast cancer is cured after treatment since 20% of the cases recur. The study showed that patients who relapse have differences in genetics.
“We demonstrate that there are clear differences within the driver landscapes of relapsed cancers. This probably reflects a combination of predisposition to relapse and of differences in the mutations acquired during the relapse and metastasis phase,” said the researchers, led by Lucy Yates, MD, a clinical research oncologist from the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute in Cambridge, United Kingdom.
After breast cancer is cured, 20% of the cases recur. This new study showed that patients who relapse have indeed differences in their genetics. Credit: AHCC Research
This could possibly shed some light on which breast cancer patients are at higher risk of relapse when they are first diagnosed. There is also a hope that women, identified as having more chance to suffer from breast cancer a second time, could be treated with drugs to prevent recurrence.
To find this out, researchers compared the genetic make-up cancer from 836 tissue samples taken from women on primary diagnosis with 161 samples of tissue taken from recurrences or metastases. In addition, they looked at 365 genes involved in cancer-related pathways and compared driver mutation in the primary and relapse datasets
“We have found that some of the genetic mutations that drive breast cancers that relapse are relatively uncommon amongst cancers that do not relapse at the point of primary diagnosis,” Dr. Yates said in a statement. “We believe that the differences we have seen reflect genetic differences that can predispose cancer to return, combined with mutations acquired throughout the period from the first diagnosis to the subsequent relapse,” she added.
October is breast Cancer Awareness Month?
These findings come ahead of the breast cancer awareness month. Since October has been declared the month to create awareness of breast cancer, several people around the country have been getting ready to show their support.
For instance, the Ventura City Fire Department will join forces with Firefighters across the country, for the fifth year in a row, to help promote Breast Cancer Awareness Month. The firefighters will wear an Embossed T-shirt from Oct. 1st to Oct. 15th in support of this cause. These shirts will also be for sale to raise money for helping women diagnosed with breast cancer.
The Apopka Police Department has gone pink to also support the cause. The department unveiled a Dodge Nitro with the police shield wrapped from behind by a pink ribbon. The donated design was made by Orlando’s Dana Safety Supply.
Debbi Turner’s Cancer Care and Resource Center has teamed with the Apopka Police Department for events throughout October. The non-profit organization is raising money to provide 220 free mammograms this year to women in Apopka.

Drinking green tea has many huge benefits

   

A girl recently (not the girl above) turned yellow after drinking a bad ingredient in Chinese green tea — but don’t let that sour you on its tremendous benefits.We recently reported on the alarming case of a 16-year-old girl in the UK who turned yellow after contracting hepatitis after drinking green tea she bought online — but don’t worry, green tea is indeed all it’s cracked up to be.

The girl had apparently purchased a green tea with a little extra in it, and the additional ingredient caused her to get hepatitis, which is severe damage to the liver that resulted in jaundice, stomach pain, and eventually hospitalization. She’s since recovered, and has vowed never to purchase such herbal remedies online again. But despite the bad experience, don’t be worried about green tea, which is extremely good for your health.
In this case, it wasn’t the green tea that caused the hepatitis, but rather an extra ingredient added to it by a suspect online company. In reality, regular green tea is loaded with health benefits.
Some doctors would even call it the healthiest thing you can drink, according to a WebMD article. While no substance by itself can protect you from illness — that has to come with a regular regimen of good diet and solid exercise habits — it goes as far as anything else you can consume can.
Green tea’s greatest benefit may be its catechin content, which are antioxidants that can prevent cell damage. Because green tea isn’t processed, it has quite rich in catechins.
Studies have sung the praises of green tea, showing that it can improve the flow of blood and lower cholesterol in the body. Green tea appears to fight a range of heart-related issues, and could help prevent heart failure and lower blood pressure.
And because it’s good for your blood, it’s good for your brain too, since brains need good blood flow to stay healthy. A Swiss study mentioned int he reported noted that people who drank green tea showed better memory abilities, and it seems to stop the formation of plaques that are tied to Alzheimer’s.
Then there’s how it affects people with diabetes. Green tea has a positive effect on blood sugar, in that it keeps it stable. Catechins lower cholesterol and blood pressure, but they also protect against the damage from a high-fat diet, according to the report.
Although green tea won’t immediately cause you to lose weight, EGCG, which is the active ingredient in the drink, has been shown in some studies to cause some weight loss, although some studies show no difference. Still, if you can start drinking green tea instead of sugary drinks, there’s no question you’ll lose some weight. In fact, you could save 50,000 calories by simply swapping out one or two cups of green tea for one can of soda over the next year. That would amount to a weight loss of 15 pounds, all from one simple change — that is, as long as you’re not filling your tea with honey, cream, or sugar.
But what about cancer? That’s a bit tougher to answer, but green tea does appear to help healthy cells as they grow. There are some indications that it may help stop cancer cells, but the research is inconclusive on that subject. The National Cancer Institute is neutral on the subject of green tea, meaning there is no evidence for or against it helping stop cancer.
Finally, there’s the question of green tea and stress. Sipping a hot cup of green tea can help you relax, and there is a chemical in green tea called theanine that can help calm you. This alone can lower your blood pressure and prolong your life, if you make this a regular practice. In addition, it just makes you feel good, and that’s always good for your health.
Of course, there is a right way and a wrong way to prepare green tea. First, you should add the tea to boiling water, as it is bad for the catechins mentioned earlier, so wait until the water is about 160 to 170 degrees. Then, add lemon, which is loaded with Vitamin C and will make it easier for your body to absorb the catechins. Also, take note of what brand you’re buying: if you buy the bargain brain canned drinks, there’s not going to be as many nutrients, whereas the pricier teas are likely to offer all the health benefits.

Irish Army officer is chosen to retrace Ernest Shackleton steps

   

A travel- and adventure-hungry Irish Army lieutenant has been selected as one of just three people selected to retrace the steps of Antarctic explorer Ernest Shackleton.

Lieutenant Sinéad Hunt, from Dublin, will retrace the steps of Ernest Shackleton’s legendary voyage from Antarctica to South Georgia and subsequent trek across that island with Frank Worsley and Kerryman Tom Crean.
The Antarctic Heritage Trust Inspiring Explorers Expedition 2015 will provide an opportunity of a lifetime in October for three young people to participate in an attempt to repeat Shackleton’s crossing to mark the centenary of the journey.
The trip of a lifetime will involve flying to Port Stanley in the Falkands and then travelling aboard Vavilov to King Haakon Bay, South Georgia.

  Ernest Shackleton the great explorer:

From there, the plan is for the expedition team to disembark and cross South Georgia to Stromness, on skis where possible, before rejoining the ship. After circumnavigating South Georgia, the ship will return to Ushuaia, Argentina.
The crossing will be a multi-day traverse of the island from South to North on skis across glaciated country and the crossing party will be self-sufficient for that time.
The success rate given for the crossing even now is just 60% due to the extreme weather conditions the trio will face.
Sineád departs for New Zealand on September 28 for two weeks training and the expedition will take place between October 17-31.
The eldest of three daughters, Sinéad grew up in North Co Dublin in a family with an appetite for travel and adventure.
Sinéad studied Mechanical Engineering at University College Dublin where she joined the UCD mountaineering club.
[timgcap=Lte Sinead Hunt pictured practising her endurance tests at Aunascaul Lake in County Kerry]zzzLieutenantSineadHunt250915_large.jpg[/timg]
During her university years, she climbed all over Ireland and, from there, the Scottish Highlands, to learn winter climbing skills, and to the Alps, discovering skiing and Alpine mountaineering.
“I think it’s going to be a bit of a whirlwind trip. I will take it as a it goes,” she said.
Sinéad enlisted in the Irish Defence Forces like her father and grandfather before her, through the Officer Cadetship training programme.    

Monday, June 18, 2012

A tribute Blog on Aung San Suu Kyi


Aung San Suu Kyi: behind the fragile Woman that is Burma’s great hope 

‘A cead mile failte’

   
Aung San Suu Kyi comes to Dublin on Monday. She is Burma’s ‘only hope’, a political icon, and the whole world wants a piece of her.
Can this one woman – strong and stubborn but physically fragile and with no experience of government – deliver these high expectations to the Burmese people. 
AT ABOUT 5PM ON Saturday, November 13th, 2010, soldiers armed with rifles and tear-gas launchers pushed aside the barbed-wire barriers that blocked the route to a dilapidated villa at 54 University Avenue in Rangoon.
A swarm of excited people dashed the final 100 metres to the gate. “Twenty minutes later, a slight 65-year-old woman popped her head over her red spiked fence,” reported the Los Angeles Times. And the crowd went wild. “I’m very happy to see you,” she yelled over the chants, the loud sobbing and the shouted words of love. “It’s been a very long time since I’ve seen you.”
The tidal wave of joy and adulation surging across the world found expression as far away as Co Carlow, where a small group of Rohingya Muslims, one of three Burmese communities in the State, felt the first stirrings of hope.
“She is our only hope,” says Haikal, a Burmese student living in Ireland. “She is the only one who can bring justice and the rule of law to our community.”
Where some may see green shoots of democracy in Burma, Haikal, a grave young man, sees no change. For several days last week, he says, his mother and family, who are still in Burma, came under violent attack from Buddhists and he didn’t hear from them for three days.
Although they have lived there for hundreds of years, the million or so Rohingya people within Burma are treated as illegal immigrants. They require permits in order to marry and to travel to other towns. They are restricted to three children per family and are barred from studying the higher professions, such as medicine and law.
As the words pour out in a torrent, the sense of expectation invested in the slight woman who turns 67 on Tuesday becomes almost oppressive. In the tinderbox of Burma and its population of 55 million, the Rohingya, who are officially stateless, aren’t even numbered among the 135 ethnic groups clamouring for attention after a generation of dictatorship.
“Yes, we’re worried about the expectations on Aung San Suu Kyi as well: very worried,” says Haikal. “The majority in Burma are the Buddhist people, and she can’t talk against them . . . If she talks to one side, she might lose support in the 2014 elections. But she is the champion of human rights. She is the one who wants to reconcile all ethnic groups.”
This, then, is the enormous expectation invested in one woman, whose moral strength was never in doubt but whose physical frailty was painfully evident on Thursday in Geneva when, in the middle of a press conference, an assistant had to rush to her side after she was taken ill. During her nationwide election campaign in March, she had to withdraw on several occasions for health reasons, citing exhaustion, hot weather and airsickness.
Despite the steely resolution, the ramrod-straight deportment and the cheerful flowers in her hair, visitors to Rangoon have invariably described her as fragile. It could hardly be otherwise, after 20 years of an emotional and psychological crucifixion, several assassination attempts and 15 years of detention, during which 15 armed soldiers, inside and outside her home, watched her every move.
One by one, every human consolation was taken: her party colleagues, her friends, her children and her husband, according to Peter Popham, author of a masterly biography, The Lady and the Peacock.
She had no telephone because a soldier had severed the cable. When the regime opened one of her parcels and had the contents – a Jane Fonda workout video, the Encyclopaedia Brittanica, novels and food in jars and tins – photographed for a newspaper, she refused any further mail. Rather than accept food from the regime, she instructed guards to sell the furniture for food. Her hair fell out for lack of nourishment. Her weight dropped to about six and a half stone, and she developed spondylosis, a degeneration of the spinal column.
She spent the monsoon months moving her bed, bowls, basins and buckets around the bedroom to catch the leaks that soaked her mattress. The roof leaked because her only surviving sibling and eldest brother, Aung San Oo, had filed a court case in 2000, allegedly at the behest of the regime, claiming half the house belonged to him and blocking repairs on the basis that they would “damage” his property. The case dragged on until 2010 when, to general amazement, the courts found in her favour.
Aung San Oo is “strangely absent from Suu’s story”, says Popham. The froideur between them was evident long before her immersion in Burmese politics. Lady Pat Gore-Booth, Suu Kyi’s London-based guardian in her Oxford years, noticed it even then. A charmless individual by all accounts, Aung San Oo studied electrical engineering at Imperial College London, from where, in Popham’s words, “he proceeded to a career and marriage (to a Burmese woman) in the US with speed and dispatch, renouncing his Burmese citizenship in favour of American along the way”.
IN THE SPACE of six years Suu Kyi lost two other siblings at a young age, as well as her father, Aung San. A revered national figure, he was only 30 when he forged Burma’s first army and then, with perfect timing, turned it against Japan, the power that had sponsored it. A patriot with a pragmatic streak, he first looked to the Japanese to help free Burma from British rule until he discovered, to his horror, that he and his army colleagues “had swapped one form of enslavement for another”, writes Popham. On his way to London to negotiate a settlement with the British, he told journalists that he wanted “complete independence”, not dominion status. It is said that Michael Collins was one of his inspirations. In any event, the British were ready to deal.
In the Burmese elections in 1947 his party won 248 of the 255 seats, and Aung San became the pre-eminent leader of the nation.
Three months later, at a cabinet meeting, five men stormed the building and assassinated him, along with most of the council.
Suu Kyi was only two at the time and has never pretended to remember much about him. But she never got over his death, argues Popham. As the daughter of a revered national martyr, she felt marked by destiny.
There was little sign of it, however, when she moved to England to study at Oxford University. The family had been well cared for by the government after Aung San’s assassination. They had been given the gracious old house on University Avenue, and Suu Kyi’s mother, Daw Khin Kyi, had been set on a career in high-profile public service.
When Suu Kyi headed to Oxford in 1964, her mother asked her old friends Sir Paul Gore-Booth and his wife, Lady Pat, to act as her daughter’s guardian; she became almost like a daughter to them.
With her elegant carriage, Audrey Hepburn looks and fresh flowers worn daily in her high ponytail, she cut an exotic figure around college. “Every male who met her had a bit of crush on her,” one man told Popham. Yet she retained something of the prim and puritanical postcolonial Victorian, a woman not for turning.
Her years at Oxford seem to have been marked by attempts to change her degree course (her eventual third-class degree, friends suggest, was the result of indifference) as well as an unrequited love for a Pakistani student, which endured for a year or two after college.
While she was trying to plot a course in life, the Gore-Booths’ son Christopher brought his lanky, rumpled friend Michael Aris to their Chelsea home and introduced him to her. Aris, a student of Tibetan language and culture, who was born in Havana to an Englishman and a French-Canadian beauty, was instantly smitten. Then he flew off to tutor the children of the Bhutanese royal family and she got a lowly UN job in New York. They got engaged while he was visiting New York, and the following year she visited him in Bhutan.
In the eight months between that visit and the wedding – a Buddhist ceremony at the Gore-Booths’ home, marked by the absences of her mother and brother – she wrote 187 letters to him.
By any standard these are untypical love letters. In what Popham calls “the mother of all pre-nups”, she makes her conditions very clear in one of them. “I ask only one thing, that should my people need me, you would help me to do my duty by them. Would you mind very much should such a situation ever arise? How probable it is I do not know, but the possibility is there.” He accepted without demur. The possibility probably seemed remote.
Her future roles at that stage seemed to be those of being a wife to a gentle scholar, and of being a mother. On the face of it, there was little to distinguish her. As Popham puts it, with stark clarity, she was a woman with a mediocre degree who had done a little part-time tutoring and a little temporary research work, obtained a postgraduate position in New York that she abandoned weeks later, and then used her name and connections to get a semi-menial job in the UN (of which U Thant, the then most famous Burmese person in the world, was secretary general), from which she resigned after three years to get married. “She was that unfortunate creature: a trailing spouse.”
She gave birth to Alexander in 1973, and by the time Kim was born, in 1977, they were back in Oxford in a college flat while Aris studied for his doctorate, living on modest funding. A friend detected “anxiety, cramp and strain” amid Suu Kyi’s bright homemade curtains and Bhutanese rugs. She ironed everything, including Aris’s socks, and was rigorous about home-cooked food.
It was Suu Kyi who gave the textbook children’s parties, but the party-game rules were enforced with unyielding exactitude, to the astonishment of the other children. “To them, Suu was kindly but grave, an uncomfortably absolute figure of justice in their malleable world,” said another mother.
Meanwhile, she returned to Burma most summers, alone or with the family, and took the boys back for shinbyu, the ceremony all Burmese Buddhist boys undergo between the ages of five and 12. She won a scholarship at Kyoto University, in Japan, to study Burma’s independence movement. She took eight-year-old Kim with her – Popham notes that he underwent a very challenging year at school there; Aris took Alexander to the Indian Himalayas while he pursued a fellowship.
IN 1988, WHEN her mother was taken to hospital in Rangoon, Suu Kyi travelled there to nurse her. She encountered an uprising, of which the results were visible in the injuries of some patients. Less than a year later she had her first close encounter with death, during a campaign tour, when soldiers were ordered to shoot her and her colleagues. Her companions stuck to the side of the road, but Suu Kyi walked into the middle, right in the line of fire. Only at the last moment was the order revoked. She recalled that some of the kneeling soldiers were “shaking and muttering to themselves”.
She survived a second serious attempt in 2003, in which 70 of her party colleagues died. To many ordinary Burmese people her ability to survive and face down her enemies suggested she was something of a living Buddha, a divine being, born to save her people from suffering. It was reported that Buddha statues had begun to weep from the left breast – indicating the feminine principle, weeping out of pity – when the regime ignored her party’s landslide victory in 1990.
“I don’t want a personality cult,” she told New York Times journalist Steven Erlanger. “We’ve had enough dictators already.” But there was little she could do about it.
It had taken 15 years, but by now the ferocious prenup promises had taken on a terrible reality. Alexander and Kim, then 16 and 11, were with her in Rangoon when she was first placed under house arrest. When Michael arrived he found his wife on the third day of a hunger strike, her one demand being that she be allowed to visit her young supporters in prison. Only when the regime gave its word did she relent. (Her fears were real. A US embassy cable from the time revealed that political prisoners were tortured with cigarette burns, electric shocks to the genitals and brutal beatings sometimes causing death).
The family had a month together then, before school beckoned back in England. The family were never reunited. This is the question that preoccupies many about Aung San Suu Kyi, and it’s one that would rarely, if ever, be directed at a man in such circumstances. When she effectively renounced her husband and vulnerable young sons, it was, to most eyes, voluntary. How could she do it?
This is what made her long years in detention so exceptional. Unlike Nelson Mandela or Andrei Sakharov, every day she could have walked free, headed for the airport and flown back to her beloved Oxford. “Every day for 15 years,” wrote Polly Toynbee after interviewing her for the Guardian, “she had to make that hard decision to stay, alone and isolated, without her two sons, even as her beloved husband was dying of cancer in Britain, cruelly forbidden from visiting her.”
Over the years her answer has been that she was not the only one; that other Burmese prisoners had suffered far more in far harsher conditions, half-starved, their health destroyed.
When Steven Erlanger asked about her family in 1989, she told him the decision “took a while ” but that when she decided, that was that. “Obviously you have to put the family second. But the kids are at an important age. Really families need to be together all the time.” Then she paused and said, with a tear running down her cheek, “My mother was very ill. It was important to be here with her.”
She told another journalist, Alan Clements, that as a mother “the greater sacrifice was giving up my sons”, but she immediately added, “I was always aware of the fact that others had sacrificed more than me.”
Drawn out a little more by Clements, she said: “When I first entered politics, my family happened to be here with me tending to my mother. So it was not a case of my suddenly leaving them, or they leaving me. It was a more gradual transition which gave us an opportunity to adjust.”
Given that her interviews were always carefully calibrated for the ears of the regime, it is difficult to take these words at face value. For the generals, all this was ammunition; the last thing she wanted to do was show that the slow torture was working. There were hints of deep grief, according to an erstwhile Burmese friend also quoted by Popham, such as when she was mending some of her young supporters’ shirts and it brought her back to Oxford and how she used to sew name tags on her sons’ school shirts. She fell silent, with tears in her eyes, wrote the friend, and said: “I had better concentrate on my new sons.”
What is beyond doubt is Aris’s unwavering support and understanding for her stance. Back in Oxford she had disliked his smoking and complained that he was too easygoing to fulfil his potential and was too tolerant of English social hypocrisy. But when the tests came, writes Popham, “without a blip, he became her other half in the world outside”.
His sister-in-law, Lucinda Aris, told Popham that Aris spent at least half of his time working on Suu Kyi’s behalf and that he had a secretary who worked exclusively on Burmese matters. “I don’t think Suu ever realised how much he did,” she said. When it came to his impending death, he remained as steadfast as ever to her cause, saying, “Don’t come, don’t come.” They shared the decision.
MUCH HAS BEEN made of her alleged stubbornness, inflexibility and refusal to concede the slightest thing in the interests of starting a dialogue, writes Popham. Would it have made a difference had she flown to her husband and children and turned off the lights at 54 University Avenue for good? “The answer is, a great deal of difference,” he says. Suu Kyi’s impact has been spiritual and emotional as much as political.
Even as the regime tried to paint her as a puppet of the West, a poster girl, even as her image was being commandeered to sell cars and light fittings, the bottom line about Suu Kyi and her unwavering place in the hearts of tens of millions of Burmese is that she could have flown away. But she never did.
Although few can know the truth of their own sacrifice, her sons have survived. Alexander, who is now said to live a reclusive life in Oregon, delivered an astonishing speech when he and Kim represented their mother at the Nobel prizegiving. Kim has paid several visits to her in Burma since her 2010 release.
Now, as a member of parliament, Suu Kyi has made the leap from icon to lawmaker. Now she isn’t merely “absorbing the hopes the people are putting on her but she begins to be responsible for making them come true,” Hillary Clinton said. “I know that route. I know how hard it is to balance one’s ideals and aspirations” with the demands of politics.
It is the steadfastness that will get her there, says Popham. And over the next few days it is probably that steadfastness that will get her through the sickness and the maelstrom of adulation, in a world where everyone wants a piece of her.
Over 20 years the woman with a third-class Oxford degree incarcerated in that shabby house on University Avenue has been showered with 66 honorary degrees and 57 international prizes. “Her great gift to her country was to throw open the windows to the outside world,” writes Popham. “At the same time she opened the windows of the world to Burma . . . Burma will never be the same again.”
Electric Burma at Bord Gáis Energy Theatre,
Aung San Suu Kyi’s six-hour visit to Ireland – one of five European countries her itinerary – comes on foot of an invitation from the lawyer Bill Shipsey, who founded Amnesty International’s artist-engagement programme. Shipsey arranged for his friend Lucinda Aris, Suu Kyi’s sister-in-law, to go to a U2 concert during which people processed across the stage in Suu Kyi masks, calling for her release.
Shipsey asked Lucinda to “tell her sister-in- law not to forget that she was to come and pick up her Ambassador of Conscience award – and if she comes, I said, we’d put on a concert for her”.With Aris’s encouragement, Amnesty sent an invitation to Suu Kyi with notes from Seamus Heaney and Mary Robinson. She accepted.
Monday’s concert, Electric Burma, at the Bord Gáis Energy Theatre, will include the presentation by Bono to Aung San Suu Kyi of Amnesty’s Ambassador of Conscience award. Afterwards, outside the theatre, with the Lord Mayor, Andrew Montague, Suu Kyi will sign the roll of honorary freedom and address the public.